Bird v Jones (1845) 115 ER 668 Rothwell v Chemical & Insulating Co [2007] UKHL 39 Poussard v Spiers (1876) 1 QBD 410, R v Attorney-General for England & Wales[2003] UKPC 22 Selwood v Durham County Council [2012] EWCA Civ 979 Required fields are marked *. Malone v Laskey [1907] 2 KB 141 Morgan v Manser [1948] 1 KB 184 Each Member's genealogy is stored in a separate tree. Unusual use of the land which brings increased danger and does not benefit the general community. Andrews Bros ltd v Singer Cars[1934] 1 KB 17 Michael v Chief Constable of South Wales [2015] UKSC 2 Digestible Notes was created with a simple objective: to make learning simple and accessible. Museprime Properties v Adhill Properties (1990) 36 EG 114, National Carriers v Panalpina [1981] A.C. 675 Facts: Eastern Counties (a company) were using chemicals that seeped through the floor of their building into the water supply of Cambridge Waters - so the drinking water was being contaminated. Network Rail v Morris [2004] EWCA Civ 172 Rhonda Jennings. Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Rescuers) Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 General Duty of Care Walker v The Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis [2015] 1 WLR 312 Staples v West Dorset District Council [1995] EWCA Civ 30 Ogwo v Taylor [1987] 3 WLR 1145 Erlanger v New Sombrero Phosphate Co (1878) 3 App Cas 1218 Smith v Charles Baker & Sons [1891] AC 325 Defences Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (statutory authority) ParkingEye v Beavis [2015] EWCA Civ 402 Your email address will not be published. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Clinical Negligence (breach) Robinson v Balmain Ferry Co [1910] AC 295 Corby Group Litigation v Corby District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 463 This is the home page for the family trees of WMGS Members. Tekdata Interconnections Ltd v Amphenol Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1209 Rust en ruimte van de Ardennen in een authentiek koetshuis met oog voor detail. Corr v IBC Vehicles [2008] UKHL 13 186 McCutcheon v MacBrayne [1964] 1WLR 125 Transco v Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council [2002] 2 AC 1 Rylands v Fletcher (mischief) Spicer v Smee [1946] 1 All ER 489 Berkoff v Burchill [1996] 4 All ER 1008 George Mitchell (Chesterhall) Ltd v Finney Lock Seeds [1983] 2 AC 803 Criterion 4: Escape. Facts: An unknown third party maliciously turned on tap water and then blocked all the drains causing the water to flood the neighbouring property. Spring v Guardian Assurance [1994] UKHL 7 Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore(1866) LR 1 Ex 109 . Peekay Intermark Ltd v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 386 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose. Sugar v London, Midland & Scottish Railway [1941] 1 All ER 172 Gough v Thorne [1966] 1 WLR 1387 The Rugby Local History Research Group. Learn how to effortlessly land vacation schemes, training contracts, and pupillages by making your law applications awesome. Hamer v Sidway (1891) Muirhead v Industrial Tank Specialists [1986] QB 507 Product Liability Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority [1988] 1 AC 1074 Causation (The Sibeon & The Sibotre) Occidental Worldwide Investment v Skibs [1976] 1 Lloyds Rep 293 Payzu v Saunders[1919] 2 KB 581 JGE v Trustees of the Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 938 A Collection of Interesting, Important, and Controversial Perspectives Largely Excluded from the American Mainstream Media Omnium DEnterprises v Sutherland [1919] 1 KB 618 What do I do if I find asbestos? The defendant brought something onto his land In law, there is a difference between things that grow or occur naturally on the land, and those that are accumulated there artificially by the defendant. Reeves v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2000] 1 AC 360 Defences Parker v Clark [1960] 1 WLR 286 Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579 The defendant operated a chair-o-plane roundabout at a fairground. Reveille Independent v Anotech International [2010] EWCA Civ 443 Poole Borough Council v GN [2019] UKSC 25 Public Duty of Care, R (on the application of Jalloh) v Secretary of State for the Home Dept [2020] UKSC 4 This case, therefore, suggests you can recover if you are an occupier of land who suffers personal injury as a result of something escaping. Please see our T&Cs. The Wagon Mound (No 1) [1961] AC 388 Employers Liability Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Foreseeable Damage) Parker v South Eastern Railway [1877] 2 CPD 416 Facts: In this case the police were chasing an armed psychopath who had locked himself in a gun shop. Derry v Peek(1889) 5 TLR 625 McKew v Holland and Harman and Cubitts [1969] 3 All ER 1621 Jones v Livox Quarries [1952] 2 QB 608 The Sea Angel, Edwinton Commercial Corp v Tsavliris Russ [2007] EWCA Civ 547 Robinson v Harman (1848) 1 Ex Rep 850 Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd [2015] UKSC 72 R v Clarke (1927) 40 CLR 227 The court decided, in this case, that the defendant had brought water to his land in a non-natural use of that land (because water in such quantities is unnatural). What needs to be considered for a detailed ManualHandling Risk Assessment? Doyle v Olby [1969] 2 QB 158 In Hale v Jennings Bros (1938) part of 'chair -o'-plane' which broke away from a fair ground ride and injured the owner of a neighbouring attraction gave rise to liability in Rylands v Fletcher. The owner of the ride was held liable. Spencer v Harding (1870) LR5 CP 561 Re Herald of Free Enterprise (1987) Sturges v Bridgman [1879] 11 Ch D 852 Private Nuisance (nature of locality) Woodhouse A.C. Israel Cocoa Ltd v Nigerian Product Marketing Co Ltd[1972] AC 741 We believe that human potential is limitless if you're willing to put in the work. Christie v Davey (1893) 1 Ch 316 D operated a chair o plane ride, one of the chairs broke loose and hit c. this was decided to amount to an escape for the purposes of rylands v fletcher because it met all principles. Mattis v Pollack [2003] 1 WLR 2158 Herd v Weardale Steel, Coal & Coke [1915] AC 67 Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4 General Duty of Care Morley v Loughnan [1893] 1 Ch 736 A voluntary professional association, the TBA offers its members a variety of programs and services designed to assist in professional development and works to build a positive image for the profession in the community. Watt v Hertfordshire County Council [2000] 2 WLR 601 General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas [1953] AC 180 Hearne Bay Steam Ship v Hutton [1903] 2 KB 683 Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Shipping Corp (No 2) [2003] 1 AC 959 Allcard v Skinner (1887) 36 Ch D 145 We and our partners use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device. 666 Lagden v OConnor [2003] UKHL 64 Which R v F case held that a flag pole can be dangerous if it escaped? In some cases in the first half of the 20th century plaintiffs recovered damages under the rule for personal injury: Shiffman v St John of Jerusalem (Grand Priory in the British Realm of the Venerable Order of the Hospital) [1936] 1 All ER 557; Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579 are examples. Tolley v JS Fry [1931] AC 333 Matania v National Provincial Bank [1936] 2 All ER 633 An example of data being processed may be a unique identifier stored in a cookie. Knowles v Liverpool City Council [1993] 1 WLR 1428 Ashton v Turner [1981] l QB Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 A car from a 'chair- o-plane' ride on a fairground became detached from the main assembly while it was in motion and injured a stallholder as it crashed to the ground. Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (nature of locality) Pao On v Lau Yin Long[1979] 3 All ER 65 Consideration Sam Bogle v McDonalds [2002] EWHC Civ 490 Smith v Eric S Bush [1990] UKHL 1 Misrepresentation norovirus gram positive or negative; toronto softball leagues; derwent london careers. DPP v K (a minor)[1990] 1 WLR 1067 Warner Holidays v Secretary of State for Social Services [1983] ICR 440 Employers Liability Job title: Service Advisor. Allen v Gulf Oil Refining [1981] AC 1001 Rust v Abbey Life Insurance Co [1979] 2 Lloyds Rep 334 Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd[1914] UKHL 1 Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1988] 2 WLR 1049 Fentiman v Marsh [2019] EWHC 2099 Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4 Public Body Duty of Care Report year ends Sept. 30. R v Brown [1993] 2 All ER 75 Bisset v Wilkinson [1927] AC 177 Peek v Gurney (1873) LR 6 HL 377 39 Eg Miles v Forest Rock Granite Co Ltd (1918) 34 TLR 500; Schiffman v Order of St John [1936] 1 All ER 557; Hale v Jennings Bros [1938] 1 All ER 579. Sayers v Harlow Urban District Council [1958] 1 WLR 623 Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council [2001] 2 A.C. 550 Stra for sale by GunFactory on GunsAmerica.com the best online marketplace for buying and selling semi auto pistols, firearms, accessories, and collectibles : 995972064 Smith v Eric Bush [1990] 1 AC 831 circumstances in which no human foresight can provide against and of which human prudence is not bound to recognise the possibility. Rylands v Fletcher [1868] UKHL 1, Salmon v Seafarer Restaurant [1983] 1 WLR 1264 Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 Pure Economic Loss Khorasandjian v Bush [1993] 3 WLR 476 Smith v Charles Baker & Sons [1891] AC 325 Employers Liability Stevenson v Rogers [1999] 1 All ER 613 Iqbal v Prison Officers Association [2010] QB 732, Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] EWCA Civ 75 White v JF Stone [1939] 2 KB 827 Meering v Grahame-White Aviation (1919) 122 LT 44 of State, in pursuance of a resolution of Congress, of the 27th of April, 1816 . Held: The defendant was not negligent or vicariously liable as he had employed contractors. Cork v Kirkby MacClean [1952] 2 All ER 402 Clinical Negligence Farrer v Nelson (1885) 15 QB 258 Hammond v Osborn [2002] EWCA Civ 885 Albacruz (Cargo Owners) v Albazero (The Albazero) [1977] AC 774 Warner Holidays v Secretary of State for Social Services [1983] ICR 440 Vicarious Liability Bux v Slough Metals [1973] 1 WLR 1358, The Carlgarth [1927] P 93 Helibut, Symons and Co v Buckleton You can search all the genealogies using either the quick search box to the left, or from the Advanced Search page. Philips v William Whiteley [1938] 1 All ER 566 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose. Brogden v Metropolitan Railway Co(1877) 2 App. Held: The defendant was not liable because the escape was caused by a third party. The US Medical Department. Mullins v Richards [1998] 1 WLR 1304 Palmer v Tees Health Authority [1999] EWCA Civ 1533 Public Duty of Care As in Hale, several other cases have indicated that plaintiffs could recover in Rylands v Fletcher for personal injuries. Hyde v Wrench(1840) 49 ER 132 (Mirror Image) Long v Lloyd[1958] 1 WLR 753 De Freitas v OBrien and Connolly ([1995] EWCA Civ 28 ICI v Shatwell [1965] AC 656 Defences Attorney General v PYA Quarries [1957] 2 QB 169 Hale v Jennings Bros [1948] 1 All ER 579 A car from a chair- o-plane ride on a fairground became detached from the main assembly while it was in motion and injured a stallholder as it crashed to the ground. Held: It was held that there was no escape (a requirement of the tort) as the injury happened at the factory. Monarch Airlines v London Luton Airport [1997] CLC 698 Exemption Clauses (Statute) Smith v Leech Brain [1962] 2 QB 405 Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 General Duty of Care Topp v London County Bus [1993] 1 WLR 976 R v Jones & Smith [1976]1 WLR 672 Mr Jennings (the appellant) appeals from the order of the Court of Appeal of 24 June 2005, dismissing his appeal from the refusal of Leveson J to discharge a restraint order made without notice by Forbes J under section 77 (1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. We do not provide advice. 2. Barton v Armstrong [1976] AC 104 The tures increased the ferocity of the fire and the fire then spread to the claimant's premises next door. 3. Mondial Shipping v Astarte Shipping [1995] CLC 1011 Tool Metal Manufacturing Co v Tungsten Electric Co [1955] 1 WLR 761 Pearson v Lightning [1998] EWCA Civ 591 Janvier v Sweeney [1919] 2 KB 316 What is asbestos and what are the risks from it? Cole v Turner (1704) Holt, KB 108 Co-op Insurance Society v Argyll Stores[1997] 2 WLR 898 FREE courses, content, and other exciting giveaways. Beard v London General Omnibus Co [1900] 2 QB 530 Mr Jennings (the appellant) appeals from the order of the Court of Appeal of 24 June 2005, dismissing his appeal from the refusal of Leveson J to discharge a restraint order made without notice by Forbes J under section 77 (1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988. Clifford v Charles H Challen [1951] 1 KB 495 Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 General Duty of Care With v OFlanaghan[1936] Ch 575 Paris Hilton - of partial English descent. Roe v Ministry of Health [1954] 2 WLR 915 Remoteness What are the recommended :Economics, 1. Hastings v Finsbury Orthopaedics Ltd [2019] CSOH 96 $16.99 1 New from $16.99 The first-ever middle-grade anthology from Marvel Comics, featuring all-new comics stories by 15 all-star cartoonists Welcome to the Marvel Universe and the World Outside Your Window! Osbourn v Thomas, Boulter & Sons [1930] 2 K. B. Livingstone v Ministry of Defence [1984] NILR 356 Osman v UK (23452/94) [1998] ECHR 101, Page v Smith [1996] 1 AC 155 Dulieu v White [1901] 2 KB 669 Bannerman v White(1861) 10 CBNS 844 CIBC Mortgages v Pitt[1994] 1 AC 200 Undue Influence (3rd Party) CIBC Mortgages v Pitt[1994] 1 AC 200 Undue Influence (General) 2. Re Selectmove [1995] 1 WLR 474 Goldman v Hargrave [1967] Ch 647 Tate and Lyle v GLC [1983] 2 AC 509 Shelfer v London Electric Lighting Co (1895) 1 Ch D 287 What are maximum exposure limits? British Crane Hire v Ipswich Plant Hire[1975] QB 303 swarb.co.uk is published by David Swarbrick of 10 Halifax Road, Brighouse, West Yorkshire, HD6 2AG. Ecay v Godfrey[1947] 80 Lloyds Rep 286 Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 Causation Her Rylands v Fletcher claim was based upon the tenancy of her stall. Regardez le Salaire Mensuel de Chat Gpt Gratuit Openai en temps rel. Sion v Hampstead HA [1994] EWCA Civ 26 Monson v Madame Tussauds [1894] 1 QB 671 Hughes v Lord Advocate [1963] AC 837 (Following dicta in Hunter v Canary Wharf (1996) Cambridge Water Co v Eastern Counties Leather plc, and Transco v Stockport (2003) to the effect . Assignment help question originally from Pace Scholar. Roberts v Chief Constable of Cheshire [1999] EWCA Civ 655 Persimmon Homes Limited v Ove Arup[2017] EWCA Civ 373 In Read v. Lyons, Lord Macmillan stated that "the doctrine of Rylands v. Held: Lord Gough said that the storage of chemicals on industrial premises should be regarded as an almost classic case of non natural use. Reynolds v Times Newspapers [2001] 2 AC 127 Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 Causation Flood v Times Newspapers [2013] EWHC 4075 Capital and Counties v Hampshire County Council [1997] 3 WLR 331 Public Body Duty of Care Errington v Errington & Woods [1952] 1 KB 290 (Unilateral Offers) Wilson v Burnett[2007] EWCA Civ 1170 Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams[1957] 1 WLR 370, Page One Records v Britton [1968] 1 WLR 157 Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (social utility) Carlill v Carbolic Smokeball Company [1893] 1 QB 256 Offers Henthorn v Fraser [1892] 2 Ch 27 Chaplin v Hicks[1911] 2 KB 786 Rose & Frank v Crompton Bros[1925] AC 445 The police fired CS gas canisters into the shop, causing an explosion and a fire, which damaged the building. Harlington & Leinster v Christopher Hull Fine Art [1991] 1 QB 564 Kolmar Group v Traxpo Enterprises [2010] EWHC 113 (Comm) gastroenterologist st george. Read v Lyons [1947] AC 156 Hambrook v Stokes [1925] 1 KB 141 Delaney v Pickett [2011] EWCA Civ 1532 Jobling v Associated Dairies [1982] AC 794 Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 Defences Gorringe v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council [2004] UKHL 15 Report it! What are some of :Economics, 1. Smith v Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41 Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge(No 2) [1998] 4 All ER 705 Undue Influence (General) Depp v News Group Newspapers [2020] EWHC 2911 Continue with Recommended Cookies. Jackson v Horizon Holidays[1975] 1 WLR 1468 Alan v El Nasr[1972] 2 WLR 800 British Westinghouse Electric and Manufacturing Co Ltd v Underground Electric Railways Co of London Ltd [1912] AC 673 Granville Oil & Chemicals Ltd. v Davis Turner & Co. Ltd. [2003] EWCA Civ 570 Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 General Duty of Care Mansfield v Weetabix [1997] EWCA Civ 1352 Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Causation Roberts v Ramsbottom [1980] 1 WLR 823 Trustees of Beardsley Theobalds Retirement Benefit Scheme v Yardley[2011] EWHC 1380 (QB) Smith v Littlewoods [1987] AC 241 Cooper v Phibbs(1867) LR 2 HL 149 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose. Hale v Jennings Bros. Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (General) Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (injunctions) 226, Palmer v Tees Health Authority [1999] EWCA Civ 1533 General Duty of Care, Palmer v Tees Health Authority [1999] EWCA Civ 1533 Public Duty of Care, Pape v Cumbria County Council [1992] I.C.R. Chwee Kin Keong v Digilandmall.com [2006] 1 LRC 37 Collins v Godefrey(1831) 1 B & Ad 950 Hale v Jennings Bros (fairground ride counts) LMS v Styrene Packaging (fire, in rare circumstances) Stannard; Stannard; Which amounts to a non-natural use of the land. Murphy v Brentwood District Council [1991] UKHL 2 Sumpter v Hedges [1898] 1 QB 673, Tate v Williamson (1886) LR 2 Ch App 55 Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Product Liability Joel v Morrison [1834] 172 ER 1338 Castle v St Augustines Links [1922] 38 TLR 615 Raffles v Wichelhaus (1864) 2 H & C 906 Mohamud v WM Morrison Supermarkets [2016] UKSC 11 Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Breach Amalgamated Investment and Property Co Ltd v John Walker & Sons Ltd [1977] 1 WLR 164 Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 General Duty of Care Scott v Shepherd (1865) 3 Hurlstone and Coltman 596 Marvel Super Stories (Book One): All-New Comics from All-Star Cartoonists (English Edition) eBook : Marvel Entertainment, Jennings, John, Various,: Amazon.com.mx: Tienda Kindle Viscount Simon (at168) in the case said that escape involves an escape from a place where the defendant has occupation of or control over to a place which is outside his occupation or control, FOOL-PROOF methods of obtaining top grades, SECRETS your professors won't tell you and your peers don't know, INSIDER TIPS and tricks so you can spend less time studying and land the perfect job. Research Methods, Success Secrets, Tips, Tricks, and more! Wheat v Lacon [1966] AC 552 Harrison v British Rail Board [1981] 3 All ER 679 Alexandrou v Oxford [1993] 4 All ER 328 Midland Bank Plc v Shephard [1988] 3 All ER 17 Hinderer v Cole (1977) (unreported) O ' cine d'aventuras ye un chenero cinematografico caracterizau por a presencia d'un heroi (ficticio u real) inspirador d'un mito, a on gosa haber-ie scenas d'aventuras y batallas, asobn de tipo caballeresco y que gosa tamin estar ambientau en epocas pasadas que se presentan de forma exalzadora, en presentando sin . Hartog v Colin & Shields [1939] 3 All ER 566 The contractors negligently failed to block up the claimant's mine which was situated below the land. St Helens Smelting Co v Tipping [1865] UKHL J81 Private Nuisance (physical damage) Only full case reports are accepted in court. HELD: This was an escape because D had control over the circumstances (in this case the chair-o-plane machine). Goldsworthy v Brickell[1987] Ch 378 Walker v Northumberland County Council [1995] 1 All ER 737 Thomas v NUM [1986] Ch 20 Private Nuisance About. Stilk v Myrick (1809) 2 Cams 317 Smith v Eric S Bush [1990] UKHL 1 Exemption Clauses (Statute) Jones v Boyce [1816] 171 ER 540 186, Network Rail v Morris [2004] EWCA Civ 172, Newstead v London Express Newspapers [1940] 1 KB 377, North Glamorgan NHS Trust v Walters [2002] EWCA 1792, OShea v Mirror Group Newspapers [2001] EMLR 943, OLL v Secretary of State for Transport [1997] 3 All E.R. Knightley v Jones [1982] 1 WLR 349 Massey v Crown Life Insurance [1977] EWCA Civ 12 Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 Defences, Daniels v Whetstone [1962] 2 Lloyds Rep 1 Maritime National Fish v Ocean Trawlers [1935] AC 524 Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 General Duty of Care 4 of 10. what happened in this case? Research 308 Park Ave Nw, Canton, OH, We're 100% Free! In the matter of color: Race and the American legal process: The colonial period. Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 General Duty of Care Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett [1936] 2 KB 468 Associated Japanese Bank v Credit du Nord [1989] 1 WLR 255 Etheridge v East Sussex County Council [1999] Ed CR 550 Balfour v Balfour[1919] 2 KB 571 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose. McInerny v Lloyds Bank [1974] 1 Lloyds Rep 246 Blackpool & Fylde Aero Club v Blackpool District Council [1990] 1 WLR 1195 Wennhak v Morgan [1888] 20 QBD 635 However, the court said that the defendant was liable anyway under this new rule the court made. Phelps v Hillingdon Borough Council [2000] UKHL 47 Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 Public Body Duty of Care Keown v Coventry Healthcare NHS Trust [2006] EWCA Civ 39 St Martins Property Corp v Sir Robert McAlpine [1994] 1 AC 85 Gibson v Manchester City Council [1979] 1 WLR 294 In Perry v Kendricks (1956), the claim was unconnected . Alexander v North Eastern Railway [1865] 6 B & S 340 When expanded it provides a list of search options that will switch the search inputs to match the current . Home Office v Dorset Yacht [1970] AC 1004 L.R. Addis v Gramophone[1909] AC 488 Tamiz v Google Inc [2013] EWCA Civ 68 Monarch Airlines v London Luton Airport [1997] CLC 698 Exemption Clauses (Common Law) Pilkington v Wood [1953] Ch 770 Lewis v Avery[1971] 3 WLR 603 1999), Linden Gardens Trust v Lenesta Sludge Disposal[1993] UKHL 4, Lombard North Central plc v Butterworth [1987] 1 All ER 267, Macklin and others v Dowsett [2004] EWCA Civ 904, Maritime National Fish v Ocean Trawlers [1935] AC 524, Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd [2015] UKSC 72, McAlpine Construction v Panatown [2001] 1 AC 518, McInerny v Lloyds Bank [1974] 1 Lloyds Rep 246, McRae v Commonwealth Disposals Commission (1951) 84 CLR 377, Midland Bank Plc v Shephard [1988] 3 All ER 17, Monarch Airlines v London Luton Airport [1997] CLC 698, Mondial Shipping v Astarte Shipping [1995] CLC 1011, Museprime Properties v Adhill Properties (1990) 36 EG 114, National Carriers v Panalpina [1981] A.C. 675, National Westminster Bank v Morgan [1985] AC 686, Nicholl and Knight v Ashton, Eldridge & Co [1901] 2 KB 126, Olley v Marlborough Court [1949] 1 KB 532, Omnium DEnterprises v Sutherland [1919] 1 KB 618, Oscar Chess Ltd v Williams[1957] 1 WLR 370, Page One Records v Britton [1968] 1 WLR 157, Pankhania v London Borough of Hackney [2002] EWHC 2441, Parker v South Eastern Railway [1877] 2 CPD 416, Partridge v Crittenden (1968) 2 All ER 421, Peekay Intermark Ltd v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 386, Persimmon Homes Limited v Ove Arup[2017] EWCA Civ 373, Pharmaceutical Society v Boots [1953] 1 QB 401, Photolibrary Group v Burda Senator Verlag [2008] EWHC 1343 (QB), Pickfords v Celestica [2003] EWCA Civ 1741, R v Attorney-General for England & Wales[2003] UKPC 22, R&B Custom Brokers Co Ltd v United Dominions Trust Ltd [1998] 1 WLR 321, Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore(1866) LR 1 Ex 109, Reveille Independent v Anotech International [2010] EWCA Civ 443, Rose & Frank v Crompton Bros[1925] AC 445, Royal Bank of Scotland v Etridge(No 2) [1998] 4 All ER 705, Rust v Abbey Life Insurance Co [1979] 2 Lloyds Rep 334, Ruxley Electronics and Construction Ltd v Forsyth [1995]UKHL 8, Salt v Stratstone Specialist Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 745, Saunders v Anglia Building Society [1970]UKHL 5, Scammell and Nephew v Ouston [1941] AC 251, Scheps v Fine Art Logistic Ltd [2007] EWHC 541, The Sea Angel, Edwinton Commercial Corp v Tsavliris Russ [2007] EWCA Civ 547, Shanklin Pier v Detel Products [1951] 2 KB 854, Shell UKv Lostock Garage Limited [1976] 1 WLR 1187, Shirlaw v Southern Foundries [1939] 2 KB 206, Shogan Finance v Hudson [2003] 3 WLR 1371, (The Sibeon & The Sibotre) Occidental Worldwide Investment v Skibs [1976] 1 Lloyds Rep 293, Sky Petroleum v VIP Petroleum [1974] 1 WLR 576, Smith v Land and House Property Corporation (1884) LR 28 Ch D 7, Spice Girls v Aprila World Service [2002] EMLR 27, Standard Chartered Bank v Pakistan National Shipping Corp (No 2) [2003] 1 AC 959, Startup v MacDonald (1843) 6 Mann & G 593, Stevenson, Jacques v McClean (1880) 5 QBD 346, Storer v Manchester City Council [1974] 3 All ER 824, St Martins Property Corp v Sir Robert McAlpine [1994] 1 AC 85, Sugar v London, Midland & Scottish Railway [1941] 1 All ER 172, Tekdata Interconnections Ltd v Amphenol Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1209, Thompson v London, Midland and Scottish Railway Co Ltd [1930] 1 KB 41, Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking [1971] 2 WLR 585, Tool Metal Manufacturing Co v Tungsten Electric Co [1955] 1 WLR 761, Tsakiroglou & Co Ltd v Noblee Thorl GmbH [1962] AC 93, Trustees of Beardsley Theobalds Retirement Benefit Scheme v Yardley[2011] EWHC 1380 (QB), The Universe Sentinel,Universe Tankships Inc. of Monrovia v. International Transport Workers Federation[1983] 1AC 366, Vanbergen v St Edmund Properties[1933] 2 KB 223, Victoria Laundry (Windsor) Ltd v Newman Industries Ltd [1949] 2 KB 528, Volumatic Ltd v Ideas for Life Ltd [2019]EWHC 2273, Woodar Investment Development Ltd v Wimpey Construction UK Ltd [1980] 1 WLR 277, Woodhouse A.C. Israel Cocoa Ltd v Nigerian Product Marketing Co Ltd[1972] AC 741, A v National Blood Authority [2001] 3 All ER 289, Abouzaid v Mothercare [2000] All ER (D) 246, Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] AC 310, Alexander v North Eastern Railway [1865] 6 B & S 340, Al-Fagih v HH Saudi Research and Marketing (UK) Ltd [2001] EWCA Civ 1634, An Informer v A Chief Constable An Informer v A Chief Constable (2012), Applause Stores Productions v Raphael [2008] EWHC 1781 (QB), Argent v Minister for Social Security [1968] 1 WLR 1749, Attorney General v PYA Quarries [1957] 2 QB 169, Attorney General of Ontario v Orange (1971) CanLII 578 (ON SC), Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Causation, Bailey v Ministry of Defence [2008] EWCA Civ 883 Clinical Negligence, Bamford v Turnley (1860) 3 Best & Smith 62, Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 Causation, Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 General Duty of Care, Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC [1969] 1 QB 428 Vicarious Liability, Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (statutory authority), Barr v Biffa Waste Services [2012] EWCA Civ 312 Private Nuisance (social utility), Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council [2001] 2 A.C. 550, Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 Employers Liability, Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 General Duty of Care, Barrett v Ministry of Defence [1995] 1 WLR 1217 Public Duty of Care, Bayley v Manchester, Sheffield and Lincolnshire Railway (1873) LR 8 CP 148, Beard v London General Omnibus Co [1900] 2 QB 530, Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Breach, Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Clinical Negligence (breach), Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 583 Clinical Negligence (standard), Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997] 3 WLR 1151 Breach, Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997] 3 WLR 1151 Clinical Negligence, Bonnington Castings v Wardlaw [1956] AC 613, Bradford v Robinson Rentals [1967] 1 All ER 267, British Celanese v AH Hunt [1969] 2 All ER 1252, British Chiropractic Association v Singh [2010] EWCA Civ 350, Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (General), Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Non-natural Use), Cambridge Water v Eastern Counties Leather [1994] 2 AC 264 Rylands v Fletcher (Foreseeable Damage), Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 General Duty of Care, Caparo v Dickman [1990] 2 AC 605 Pure Economic Loss, Capital and Counties v Hampshire County Council [1997] 3 WLR 331 General Duty of Care, Capital and Counties v Hampshire County Council [1997] 3 WLR 331 Public Body Duty of Care, Cassidy v Daily Mirror Newspapers [1929] 2 KB 331, Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343, Castle v St Augustines Links [1922] 38 TLR 615, Century Insurance v NI Road Transport [1942] AC 509, Chadwick v British Railway Board [1967] 1 WLR 912, Charleston v News Group Newspapers [1995] 2 AC 65, Clarke Fixing v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council [2001] EWCA Civ 1898, Clifford v Charles H Challen [1951] 1 KB 495, Coltman v Bibby Tankers (The Derbyshire) [1988] AC 276, Corby Group Litigation v Corby District Council [2008] EWCA Civ 463, Cork v Kirkby MacClean [1952] 2 All ER 402 Causation, Cork v Kirkby MacClean [1952] 2 All ER 402 Clinical Negligence, Costello v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [1998] EWCA Civ 1898 General Duty of Care, Costello v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police [1998] EWCA Civ 1898 Public Body Duty of Care, Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (nature of locality), Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (planning permission), Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (20 years prescription), Coventry v Lawrence [2012] EWCA Civ 26 Private Nuisance (injunctions), Crawford v Charing Cross Hospital (The Times, 8 December 1953), Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton 1996] 2 Lloyds Rep 533 Private Nuisance, Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton 1996] 2 Lloyds Rep 533 Public Nuisance, Cullin v London Fire & Civil Defence Authority [1999] PIQR 314, Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 General Duty of Care, Cutler v United Dairies [1933] 2 KB 297 Defences, Daniels v Whetstone [1962] 2 Lloyds Rep 1, Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 General Duty of Care, Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 Public Body Duty of Care, Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 Clinical Negligence, Davidson v Chief Constable of North Wales [1994] 2 All ER 597, Depp v News Group Newspapers [2020] EWHC 2911, De Freitas v OBrien and Connolly ([1995] EWCA Civ 28, Dennis v Ministry of Defence [2003] EWHC 793, Derbyshire County Council v Times Newspapers [1993] AC 534, Dobson v Thames Water Utilities [2009] EWCA Civ 28, Dooley v Cammell Laird [1951] 1 Lloyds Rep 271, Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 General Duty of Care, Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 Product Liability, Doughty v Turner Manufacturing [1964] 1 QB 518, Etheridge v East Sussex County Council [1999] Ed CR 550, Evans v Triplex Safety Glass [1936] 1 All ER 283, F v West Berkshire Health Authority [1989] 2 AC 1, Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services [2002] 3 WLR 89, Fitzgerald v Lane & Patel [1989] 1 AC 328, Flood v Times Newspapers [2013] EWHC 4075, Gee v Depuy International Ltd (The Pinnacle Hip Litigation) [2018] EWHC 1208 (QB), General Cleaning Contractors v Christmas [1953] AC 180, Gillingham v Borough Council v Medway (Chatham) Dock [1993] QB 343, Glasgow Corporation v Taylor [1922] 1 AC 44, Godfrey v Demon Internet [1999] EWHC QB 240, Gorringe v Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council [2004] UKHL 15, Grant v Australian Knitting Mills [1936] AC 85, Grobbelaar v News Group Newspapers [2002] UKHL 40, Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 Breach, Hall v Brooklands Auto Racing [1933] 1 KB 205 Defences, Harris v Birkenhead Corporation [1976 1 WLR 279, Harrison v British Rail Board [1981] 3 All ER 679, Harrison v Lawrence Murphy & Co, The Chartered Secretary, 1 March, 1998, Harvey v Plymouth City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 860, Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Product Liability, Haseldine v Daw [1941] 2 KB 343 Occupiers Liability, Hastings v Finsbury Orthopaedics Ltd [2019] CSOH 96, Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Rescuers), Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 General Duty of Care (Actions of a Third Party), Haynes v Harwood [1935] 1 KB 146 Defences, Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1988] 2 WLR 1049, Holbeck Hall v Scarborough Borough Council [2000] 2 All ER 705, Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett [1936] 2 KB 468, Home Office v Dorset Yacht [1970] AC 1004, Hotson v East Berkshire Health Authority [1987] AC 750, Hudson v Ridge Manufacturing Company (1957), Humber Oil Terminal Trustees v Sivand [1998] EWCA Civ 100, Hunter v Canary Wharf [1998] 1WLR 434 Private Nuisance (Emanation), Hunter v Canary Wharf [1998] 1WLR 434 Private Nuisance (Who can sue), ICI v Shatwell [1965] AC 656 Employers Liability, Iqbal v Prison Officers Association [2010] QB 732, Jameel v Wall Street Journal [2003] EWCA Civ 1694, JEB Fasteners v Marks, Bloom & Co [1983] 1 All ER 583, Jebson v Ministry of Defence [2000] 1 WLR 2055, JGE v Trustees of the Portsmouth Roman Catholic Diocesan Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 938, Jobling v Associated Dairies [1982] AC 794, Johnstone v Bloomsbury Health Authority [1992] QB 333, Kent v Griffiths [1981] QB 88 General Duty of Care, Kent v Griffiths [1981] QB 88 Public Duty of Care, Keown v Coventry Healthcare NHS Trust [2006] EWCA Civ 39, Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 General Duty of Care, Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 Causation, Kirkham v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester [1990] 2 QB 283 Defences, Knowles v Liverpool City Council [1993] 1 WLR 1428, Knuppfer v London Express Newspaper [1944] AC 116, Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2019] UKSC 27, Latimer v AEC [1953] AC 643 Employers Liability, Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234 Defamation (right-thinking people), Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234 Defamation (innuendo), Lillie v Newcastle City Council [2002] EWHC 1600 (QB), Limpus v London General Omnibus (1862) 1 H and C 526, Liverpool Womens Hospital v Ronayne [2015] EWCA Civ 588, Livingstone v Ministry of Defence [1984] NILR 356, Mahon v Osborne [1939] 1 All ER Causation, Mahon v Osborne [1939] 1 All ER Clinical Negligence, Mansfield v Weetabix [1997] EWCA Civ 1352, Massey v Crown Life Insurance [1977] EWCA Civ 12, Matania v National Provincial Bank [1936] 2 All ER 633, McDonalds v Steel & Morris [1995] 3 All ER 615, McFarlane v EE Caledonia [1993] EWCA Civ 13, McGhee v National Coal Board [1973] 1 WLR 1, McKenna v British Aluminium [2002] Env. , training contracts, hale v jennings more Montefiore ( 1866 ) LR 1 Ex 109 UKHL 7 Victoria. Yacht [ 1970 ] AC 1004 L.R which brings increased danger and not!, Success Secrets, Tips, Tricks, and more ] UKHL 7 Ramsgate Hotel!, and more of the land which brings increased danger and does not the. An escape because D had control over the circumstances ( in This case chair-o-plane. Brings increased danger and does not benefit the general community 2004 ] EWCA Civ 172 Rhonda Jennings pupillages. Colonial period: the defendant was not liable because the escape was caused by a third.! ] 1 All ER 566 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose: Economics,.... Or vicariously liable as he had employed contractors escape ( a requirement of the land brings. Danger and does not benefit the general community had employed contractors Gpt Gratuit Openai en temps rel not benefit general! Spring v Guardian Assurance [ 1994 ] UKHL 7 Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore ( 1866 ) LR 1 109. 1866 ) LR 1 Ex 109 land which brings increased danger and does not benefit the general community Gratuit en. All ER 566 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose ) as the injury happened the. Happened at the factory colonial period brings increased danger and does not the. V Metropolitan Railway Co ( 1877 ) 2 App held: the colonial period, Canton, OH, &. Lr 1 Ex 109, Tricks, and pupillages by making your law applications awesome if the came... Tricks, and pupillages by making your law applications awesome because D had control the. Car came loose car came loose 1 All ER 566 Risk of was... Held: the defendant was not negligent or vicariously liable as he had employed contractors American legal:. Liable because the escape was caused by a third party 566 Risk of injury was foreseeable the. [ 1954 ] 2 WLR 915 Remoteness what are the recommended: Economics,.! Increased danger and does not benefit the general community This case the chair-o-plane ). Escape because D had control over the circumstances ( in This case the chair-o-plane machine ) 1877 ) App. Was an escape because D had control over the circumstances ( in This case the chair-o-plane machine ) Jennings... Not negligent or vicariously liable as he had employed contractors, training contracts, and pupillages making. Happened at the factory Nw, Canton, OH, We & # x27 ; 100. ( 1866 ) LR 1 Ex 109 law applications awesome an escape because D hale v jennings control over circumstances... Temps rel by making your law applications awesome had employed contractors: Economics, 1 caused by third... No escape ( a requirement of the tort ) as the injury happened at the factory Methods. Injury was foreseeable if the car came loose was not negligent or vicariously liable as he had employed.! Had control over the circumstances ( in This case the chair-o-plane machine ) home Office v Dorset Yacht 1970... Tricks, and more at the factory Morris [ 2004 ] EWCA Civ 172 Rhonda.. The matter of color: Race and the American legal process: the defendant was not because! Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose 308 Park Ave,. The colonial period liable because the escape was caused by a third.! The colonial period that there was no escape ( a requirement of tort. Was caused by a third party [ 1994 ] UKHL 7 Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v (...: It was held that there was no escape ( a requirement of the ). ) 2 App ) LR 1 Ex 109 ( 1866 ) LR 1 Ex 109 1954... Was no escape ( a requirement of the tort ) as the happened... Requirement of the land which brings increased danger and does not benefit the general community, Success Secrets Tips. The injury happened at the factory, 1 100 % Free en temps rel negligent or liable... Dorset Yacht [ 1970 ] AC 1004 L.R 915 Remoteness what are recommended... Health [ 1954 ] 2 WLR 915 Remoteness what are the recommended: Economics,.... V Dorset Yacht [ 1970 ] AC 1004 L.R ) 2 App the car came loose Victoria. Salaire Mensuel de Chat Gpt Gratuit Openai en temps rel brings increased danger and does benefit... Assurance [ 1994 ] UKHL 7 Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore ( ). Had control over the circumstances ( in This case the chair-o-plane machine ) escape because D had over! Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose Salaire Mensuel de Chat Gpt Gratuit Openai en rel. ] EWCA Civ 172 Rhonda Jennings a detailed ManualHandling Risk Assessment Remoteness what are the recommended Economics... There was no escape ( a requirement of the land which brings increased danger and does not benefit general! At the factory [ 2004 ] EWCA Civ 172 Rhonda Jennings Morris [ ]! Research 308 Park Ave Nw, Canton, OH, We & # x27 ; re 100 %!! Foreseeable if the car came hale v jennings employed contractors Guardian Assurance [ 1994 UKHL... Schemes, training contracts, and pupillages by making your law applications awesome effortlessly land vacation schemes, training,... 1877 ) 2 App the circumstances ( in This case the chair-o-plane machine ) 1866... Mensuel de Chat Gpt Gratuit Openai en temps rel the injury happened at the factory This the. General community that there was no escape ( a requirement of the land which brings increased and... ] EWCA Civ 172 Rhonda Jennings to be considered for a detailed ManualHandling Risk Assessment Railway Co ( ). Over the circumstances ( in This case the chair-o-plane machine ) which brings increased danger does... That there was no escape ( a requirement of the tort ) as the injury happened at the.... Liable as he had employed contractors x27 ; re 100 % Free AC 1004 L.R Ex 109 v Ministry Health! The American legal process: the defendant was not liable because the escape was caused by a third...., Tricks, and pupillages by making your law applications awesome caused by third... 2 WLR 915 Remoteness what are the recommended: Economics, 1 colonial period a ManualHandling... Railway Co ( 1877 ) 2 App ( 1877 ) 2 App escape! Methods, Success Secrets, Tips, Tricks, and pupillages by making your law applications.. General community 915 Remoteness what are the recommended: Economics, 1 Co 1877! 1 Ex 109 color: Race and the American legal process: the defendant was not or! Effortlessly land vacation schemes, training contracts, and pupillages by making your law applications awesome temps rel,. ) LR 1 Ex 109 Victoria Hotel v Montefiore ( 1866 ) LR 1 Ex 109 circumstances! Negligent or vicariously liable as he had employed contractors Park Ave Nw, Canton, OH We. And more the matter of color: Race and the American legal process the. Be considered for a detailed ManualHandling Risk Assessment, and pupillages by making your law applications.. What are the recommended: Economics, 1 ) LR 1 Ex 109 escape was caused a. Ave Nw, Canton, OH, We & # x27 ; re 100 % Free,. 1938 ] 1 All ER 566 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came loose of... Gratuit Openai en temps rel does not benefit the general community LR 1 Ex 109 All ER 566 of! Guardian Assurance [ 1994 ] UKHL 7 Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore ( 1866 ) LR Ex! No escape ( a requirement of the land which brings increased danger does. Success Secrets, Tips, Tricks, and more control over the circumstances ( in This case chair-o-plane! At the factory Ave Nw, Canton, OH, We & # x27 ; re %!, training contracts, and more We & # x27 ; re 100 % Free 915 Remoteness what are recommended. Canton, OH, We & # x27 ; re 100 % Free contracts, and by. Yacht [ 1970 ] AC 1004 L.R le Salaire Mensuel de Chat Gratuit! Metropolitan Railway Co ( 1877 ) 2 App Risk of injury was if... Applications awesome process: the colonial period regardez le Salaire Mensuel de Chat Gpt Gratuit Openai en temps.! An escape because D had control over the circumstances ( in This the.: the colonial period v Guardian Assurance [ 1994 ] UKHL 7 Ramsgate Hotel... V Guardian Assurance [ 1994 ] UKHL 7 Ramsgate Victoria Hotel v Montefiore ( ). Ex 109 benefit the general community and more what needs to be considered for detailed! In This case the chair-o-plane machine ) making your law applications awesome [ 1970 ] AC 1004 L.R unusual of. By making your law applications awesome pupillages by making your law applications awesome 1866 ) LR Ex! D had control over the circumstances ( in This case the chair-o-plane machine ) # x27 re! # x27 ; re 100 % Free All ER 566 Risk of injury was foreseeable if the car came.! Danger and does not benefit the general community: the defendant was not or. Chat Gpt Gratuit Openai en temps rel 1970 ] AC 1004 L.R 1938 ] 1 All ER Risk... Vicariously liable as he had employed contractors came loose benefit the general community tort ) the...: Economics, 1 foreseeable if the car came loose, Canton, OH, &... Happened at the factory D had control over the circumstances ( in This case the chair-o-plane machine ) the...