The primary affiliation for each author should be the institution where the majority of their work was done. 50decision sent to authorwaiting for revisionFigure 2 DavidUCSDfacetime50"f**king awesome" Shadows Over London was born out of reading to my daughter before bedtime.Katie was five or six at that time, and A link, View Decision Letter, enables the Author to reread the comments before entering a response. Thousands should be separated by commas (1,000). All authors should be included in reference lists unless there are more than five, in which case only the first author should be given, followed by 'et al.'. The EDD told us, for the month of December 2020, once the appeal and evidence arrived at the CUIAB, appellants waited on average 39 days for an UI appeal decision the darker plumage of a hawk they would become as one. In addition, Reviewers can access the manuscript online, which speeds up the review process. npj Breast Cancer | Acceptance Rate. But in June 2022, the journal was removed from SCI indexing, what can i do, so much of work in it with two revsions taking more than a year,what can be done, Why is a PhD essential to become a peer-reviewer. HANDBOOK: Keep calm and wait: A guide to understanding journal statuses. You need to sit tight and wait. contracts here, Click 'Modify My Springer Nature Account', Under the Personal Profile tab, click Create/link an Open Researcher Contributor ID (ORCID)'. How do I write an inquiry to the editor about my manuscript's current status? Decision in Process. Authors are encouraged to include both completed forms at the time of submission. Use distinct colors with comparable visibility and avoid the use of red and green for contrast. Hi, Ahmed, How long one should wait on an editor's decision depends on a variety of factors - your stature within your profession, the quality of t Parents faced with decision to vaccinate their kids against COVID-19 Pfizer was given green light by the FDA to move forward with vaccinations for kids ages 12 to 15 on Monday. Figures that do not meet these standards will not reproduce well and publication may be delayed until we receive high-resolution images. How long one should wait on an editor's decision depends on a variety of factors - your stature within your profession, the quality of the journal to which you submitted the manuscript, and the . Multi-part/panel figures must be prepared and arranged as a single image file (including all sub-parts; a, b, c, etc.). For example, your journal can draft email templates for manuscript decisions that contain the next steps editors should send all authors of accepted, rejected, or revise and resubmit submissions. for academic tenure) then Lancet Digital Health's (partial) impact factor is 24.5, npj Digital Medicine's is 11.6, and JMIR's flagship journal . Published conference abstracts, numbered patents and research datasets may be included in the reference list. Soc., 2016, 138, 8356-8359, , When acknowledging funding, our recommended best practice is that authors should acknowledge funders and grants on publications when the activities that contributed to that publication are within scope of the acknowledged grant and arise directly from a specific grant. SCI . Although the COVID-19 pandemic has increased the importance of digital technology in clinical trial implementation, there is a dearth of literature reporting on challenges and strategies related to multi-site randomized controlled trials (RCTs) among pediatric cancer survivors during the pandemic. though her mind cautioned who would serve as the meal? The Methods section should be subdivided by short bold headings referring to methods used and we encourage the inclusion of specific subsections for statistics, reagents and animal models. We encourage authors to deposit the step-by-step protocols used in their study to Protocol Exchange, an open resource maintained by Nature Research. Suitably high resolution figures may be inserted within the text at appropriate positions or grouped at the end. Manuscript received)->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision StartedDecision sent to author->Waiting for revision, ->Revision receivedManuscript #A1Manuscript under submission->Manuscript received->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration->Editor Decision Started, . Please visit our contact page. Authors are encouraged to seek copy editing or language editing services for their manuscripts, either before submission or at the revision stage, should they feel it would benefit their manuscript. When appropriate, figures should include error bars. When the Editors begin to enter a decision it will move the status to 'Decision in Process'. and through her disguises and plumbed up feathers. Global integrated drought monitoring and prediction system (GIDMaPS) data sets. Editorial Board. Legend Of The Lake Walkthrough, Please do not upload each panel individually. Provide the names of group authors and consortia in the manuscript and in the group author question on the Additional Information screen. var d=new Date(); yr=d.getFullYear();document.write(yr); Editors and Reviewers will be responsible for assessing the completeness of the characterization. Ensure authors are listed in the same order as in the manuscript. Just gently asking when could you expect the review? The corresponding author is sent proofs and is welcome to discuss changes with the Editors, but npj Computational Materials reserves the right to make the final decision about matters of style and the size of figures. Figure lettering should be in a clear, sans-serif typeface (for example, Helvetica); the same typeface in the same font size should be used for all figures in a paper. The data that support the findings of this study are available from [third party name] but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under licence for the current study, and so are not publicly available. We can accept LaTeX files at the acceptance stage, but before then please supply compiled PDFs. Each journal is able to customize the wording of the status terms, but the same status phases apply to all journals using Editorial Manager. //-->