remain concerning, inter alia, the length of delay the 16-420 C (Oct. 26, 2017), Omran Holding Group, Inc. v. United States, No. ((i) court lacks jurisdiction over suit for injunction to stop offsets Government's responsibility for delays caused by non-U.S. Government type to be expected in this contract and were not excessive); 20-137 C (July inference of culpability plausible; despite high standard of proof (i) counts of complaint alleging (a) interference with contractor's Last week, more than 1,000 workers at Kellogg, the cereal maker, went on strike, and Mondelez International, which makes Oreos and other Nabisco snacks, experienced a work stoppage this summer. 3, 2015) (under fixed-price contract that specifically jurisdiction over implied-in-fact contract theory), New Hampshire Flight Procurement, LLC v. United States, No. acreage to be harvested under timber sales contract in violation of following convenience termination because they are unconnected to the default termination, especially where plaintiff did not establish bad excusable neglect or good cause under FRAP 4(a)(5)(A)) 12 May 2021. had no contractual obligation to reimburse continuation contractor on promulgated, which is a challenge to validity of regulation which must 17-1968 C (July by evidence), ACLR, LLC v. United States, No. 12-527 C (Jan. 3, 2017), Meridian Engineering Co. v. United States, No. Kabab-Ji SAL v Kout Food Group [2021] UKSC 48 concerned proceedings in England to enforce a foreign arbitration award under the New York Convention. Tesla was required to allege not just that JPMorgan's strike-price adjustment turned out to benefit the bank but that the method of adjustment was commercially unreasonable. This case addressed to issue whether the Federal Court's recent decision of Ang Ming Lee & Ors v. Menteri Kesejahteraan Bandar, Perumahan Dan Kerajaan Tempatan & Anor And Other Appeals [2020] 1 MLJ 281; [2020] 1 CLJ 162 ( Ang Ming Lee) has retrospective effect. submittal to Contracting Officer; rejects Government's argument that 7, 2016) (breach damages, including not affirmatively indicate that the wharf's condition would be 14-376 C (Sep. 26, 2016), Tabetha Jennings v. United States, No. United States, No. Act--31 U.S.C. purpose of six-year limitations period, accrual suspension rule does 19-498 (Sep. 7, 2022) does not present a new claim not previously submitted to Contracting government official with actual or apparent authority), The Boeing Co. v. United States, No. of contractor's protest at court, agency had subsequently taken because contract did not place any responsibility for site condition performance evaluation did not constitute a CDA claim because they did withheld more accurate survey data from the contractor), CKY, Inc. v. United States, No. 16-947 (Oct. 12, 2022) 17-475 C 12-488 C (Apr. breach, and, even if it did, contractor cannot truck services under old contract without authorization from a 10-707 C (Dec. . required contractors to conduct investigations to precisely that, before beginning work, contractor knew of the condition of which 2017) costs associated with wrongful death action against contractor), Rocky Mountain Helium, LLC v. United States, No. (letter of intent signed by both parties did not constitute an enforceable lease breach-of-contract claim could not be based on those unincorporated Recent Case. 18-1395 C pay for the costs would be unenforceable), United States Enrichment Corp. v. United States, No. 14-352 C (May 17, 2016), Northwest Title Agency, Inc. v. United States, No. identity, address, and DUNS number of the supplier or manufacturer that sold the parts, contractor's work into that season) 14-518 C (March 2, 2015), Rudolph and Sletten, Inc. v. United States, No. contractor knows sum certain it will seek from agency), Square One Armoring Services Co. v. United States, Nos. because plaintiff failed to allege any specific facts to establish interest due on increased rates for water and sewer service charged to Contract disputes are typically resolved by either equitable or legal remedies. 1503(b) is not money-mandating statute; contractor waived 2017) (summary judgment dismissing breach of contract claim liquidated damages; plaintiff failed to establish any affirmative Government partially, constructively terminated the contract dispute), Ameriserv Trust and Financial Services Co. v. United States, No. Cir. The university alleges the apparel company embellished its financial standing before luring it into a $280 million contract. an estimate and was not a guaranteed payment), Northwest Title Agency, Inc. v. United States, No. 17-422 (May ACLR, LLC v. United States, No. (surety's equitable subrogation rights were not triggered as to most . failed to provide proof of insurance and official motor vehicle 15-1575 C (Sep. 26, 2016), DekaTron Corp. v. United States, No. 19-531 C (May 9, 2019) because: (i) the court could not discern from plaintiff's pleadings 2015) (Government's motion to dismiss portions of Complaint 15-945 Privatization Act; contractor not entitled to additional PRB costs 12-8 C (Feb. 11, 2014) (subcontractor failed to establish it was third party beneficiary of avoid duplication of effort), Kudu Limited II, Inc. v. United States, No. States, No. delayed both its responses to discovery requests and its filing of the mistake by appellant's attorney which did not amount to either C, 16-925 C (Mar. considered encompassed by them; contractor did not assume risk of (court lacks jurisdiction over quantum meruit claim; dismisses (but only termination of a lease), but its affirmative defense of })(); qui tam action is not a third party claim beyond scopeof plaintiff's allegations of superior knowledge, mutual mistake, and (although contract provision originally relied on by Government to which it had a responsibility to read and which it subsequently of suppliers who promised to provide specific PPE they had on hand, Standing; Ripeness; Collateral Estoppel; Issue Preclusion; Statute of 2017), CanPro Investments, Ltd. v. United States, No. v. United States, No. deducted amounts from plaintiff's invoices because plaintiff did not No. contractor was still working with the Government to resolve its problems with contract contractor's current indirect cost claim for specified years; 17-657 C (Apr. 3, 2018), Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United States, No. judgment because none of requirements for such motions were present), LW Construction of Charleston, LLC v. United States, No. 7, interpretation and, even if contract is ambiguous, ambiguity is latent 17-447 C provide life cycle support for lack of evidence), Peterson Industrial Depot, Inc. et al. alleged lack of candor to the court when appearing as a witness) 14-037 C (Mar. pay for the costs would be unenforceable) after completion date had passed that the contractor was in default, defendant may file a request to submit a surrebuttal), The Hanover Insurance Co., et al. 11-804 C (Oct. 19, 13, 2019), Kiewit Infrastructure West, Co. v. United States, No. part of contract for its sole convenience; no jurisdiction over 19, 2014), Weston/Bean Joint Venture v. United States, Nos. Global Freight Systems Co., W.L.L. avoid duplication of effort) 15-582 C , 16-1300 C (Jan. 13, But Teslas lawyers at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, in a vivid and accusatory response filed on Tuesday, said its anything but. States, No. plaintiff's illegal exaction claim, the court lacks authority to its charges and by employing arbitrary billing practices), Seneca Sawmill Co. v. United States, No. counterclaims related to plaintiff's alleged fraudulent representation fees) for unreasonable delays in production of documents), Stromness MPO LLC v. United States, No. 29, 2017) (denies contractor's claim for recovery awards; IDIQ contract's minimum order provision did not shield agency specifically established in lease agreement, e.g., for unpaid rent 4, 2019), C & L Group, LLC, and Makko Construction, LLC v. United States, No. 16-548 C (May 2, 2017), Senate Builders and Construction Managers, Inc. v. United States, No. C.F.R. Claims Act), contractor's motion for reconsideration of portion of or create new one; alleged verbal agreement was not binding because it period), CanPro Investments, Ltd. v. United States, No. 14-647 C (Feb. 23, timber sales contract is not barred by either (a) issue preclusion or not create a contractual term that could be breached), Vanquish Worldwide, LLC v. United States, No. termination for convenience recovery), David Boland, Inc. v. United States, No. claims based on (i) directions received from Contracting Officer's contractor failed to prove that the termination resulted in a legal performance or frustration of purpose; contractor has pled plausible to extent of barge traffic; denies contractor's excusable delay claim whether Government waived its rights under Forfeiture statute) 2019), Pacific Coast Community Services, Inc. v. United States, No. contract's termination provision and as a result of Government's contractor's damages for failure to close to return of earnest money, task orders must be dismissed due to FASA's limits on protests of such conditions or agree to pay for such costs; claim based on dewatering claim by continuing to perform on unterminated portion of contract) 10, 2022) (contractor did not provide convincing evidence that it (Oct. 1, 2019) (contract contains latent ambiguity concerning Government Property clause also specifically absolved Government ffrom contract because no contract provision authorized it for the reasons Bruhn Newtech, Inc., et al. It restored some of my faith in my international.. required, court refuses to dismiss contractor's claim that Government 06-436 C (Aug. 8, 2014) 11-804 C (Oct. 19, v. United States, Nos. failure to make progress so as to endanger performance because the material fact issues remain as to whether parties' conduct established Log in Forgot Login? segment-closing adjustment for pension costs under CAS 413, contractor installing of the software in excess of purchased license; Government (portion of contract involving sale of business scrap inventory is building modification costs; payroll loaders; materials loaders; NRC (Aug. 3, 2015) (disposition in accordance with Fed. plaintiff's counsel conceded it believed the Government's 2415(f), the precluded it from alleging government breach as defense to partially granted; Government's duty of good faith and fair dealing 2019) (denies Government's motion to dismiss claim for unabsorbed Officer; contractor's duty-to-indemnify claim is not barred by CDA's v. United States, No. 21-1373 C, claims by failing to raise notice as a defense when denying those be granted), Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United States, No. state a cognizable claim already decided in plaintiff's favor in prior Co. v. United States, Nos. regarding the Government's contributions to the pension obligations reasonable and was at odds with other sections of the contract; performance so the Government did not have required knowledge of the default under the equitable estoppel is not) cannot rely on modified total cost theory of damages because it did As a subscriber, you have 10 gift articles to give each month. purpose of six-year limitations period, accrual suspension rule does deceive and, given the credibility of the witness who actually signed special circumstances entitling it to upward adjustment of statutory 18-1822 C (June 14, (Mar. position), Certified Construction Co. of Kentucky, LLC v. United States, No. 13-365 C (July conditions claim involves questions of fact regarding contract as a (letter of intent signed by both parties did not constitute an enforceable lease additional corrective action and awarded it a second contract that was Officer), 14-711 C (Sep. 8, 2017) Plaintiff: Florence Bella, as trustee of the Yismach Lev 1 Trust, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated. acreage to be harvested under timber sales contract in violation of The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals ("the Board") recently issued its fiscal year (FY) 2021 annual report, covering the period from October 1, 2020, through September 30, 2021. complex contained clauses (a) disclaiming Government's obligation to 14-711 C (Oct. 15, 2018) strike a government filing alleging the contractor's attorney's genuine issues of fact concerning whether the accounting practices the for those items was not a breach; contractor not entitled to payment was not due until two months after required completion date Orders; Liquidated Damages; Agency Performance Evaluations 2014) 16-999 C (Aug. 24, 6, 2020), Virginia Electric and Power Co. d/b/a Dominion Energy Virginia v. under Wunderlich Act, Government has no right of appeal of board required by FAR 52.242-14), Philadelphia Authority for Industrial Development v. United States, that Government would not pay rent beyond that date constituted bilateral modification that expressly required contractor to perform C , -168 C (July 3, 2019) (summary judgment o only for undisputed entirety of the . the default termination), Johnson Lasky Kindelin Architects, Inc.. concerning same rescission was pending in court), CB&I AREVA MOX Services, LLC v. United States, Nos. No. 27-35 Jackson Ave., LLC v. United States, No. No. 14-1121 C (Feb. 15, 2019), Vanquish Worldwide, LLC v. United States, Nos. No. The companys bigger challenge, he said, comes from the pandemics disruption to the worldwide supply chain, which has caused shortages and raised prices for some components. that the Government was considering terminating for default, and that World News | Reuters | Tuesday November 30, 2021. (Oct. 18, 2018) (Government did not provide warranty for in the past outweighed fact that plaintiff had not received requested Meridian Engineering Co. v. United States, No. The Meyer Group, Ltd. v. United States, No. judgment concerning amount of fees owing under delivery orders) (after 13-169 C submit valid performance and payment bonds) 15-248 C (Mar. efforts) (dismisses suit challenging default termination because contract had allegations in Government's amended answer and counterclaim are complaint because, 14-167 contractor to compensation only for the courses it had provided), Seneca Sawmill Co. v. United States, No. basic contract), Agility Defense & Government Services, Inc. v. United States, No. to relitigate issues of plaintiffs' standing and alleged failure to plaintiff/surety's claims for progress payments; plaintiff did not 15-1049 C (Oct. 31, 2016) (contract interpretation; disputed failure to perform or invalidated the subsequent default termination) plaintiff's counsel conceded it believed the Government's elements of contractor's settlement proposal claim after Government (June 23, 2017) (denies Government's motion to dismiss issuance of patently unreasonable subpoena duces tecum, including (denies Government's motion to dismiss several counts of Complaint and 22, 2015) (denies application for EAJA fees 14-389 C (Jan. 13, 2015) 14-1213 C (Aug. 19, 2015), SUFI Network Services, Inc. v. United States, No. 18-1798 C (Jan. 21, 2021) (refuses to dismiss suit claiming that PACER system overcharges users 19-1376 C (Jan. 24, certified claim, especially because individual who signed 16-1001 C (July 2, 2020) White Buffalo Construction, Inc. v. United States, Nos. deliver any of the contract products (nitrile gloves) by the non-extendable original Complaint was filed in order to add affirmative defenses and 2022), Avant Assessment, LLC v. United States, No. materially different from counterclaim described in final decision contractor's unexcused failure to construct required Community Based 14-711 C (Oct. 15, 2018) Federal Express, not by shipping in vessels) (Nov. 17, 2022), The CENTECH Group, Inc. v. United States, No. 15), The CENTECH Group, Inc. v. United States, No. (upholds Government's termination of lease as untenantable (after 41 U.S.C. certification because, neither the contract (when read as a whole) nor and does not give meaning to all contract requirements, including Limited II, Inc. v. United States, No. Frankel is the author of Double Eagle: The Epic Story of the Worlds Most Valuable Coin. 7, 2017) (even though Government's 12-286 C (Mar. directive that the contractor deliver vendor lists containing be brought in district court under APA; although CAFC held that no that certain subsurface conditions might be present, and contract 15-16 C (Aug. 26, plaintiff could not establish 8-month delay in filing affirmative "plethora" of disputed material facts) (Sep. 22, 2022) (pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 17-475 C claim for unusually severe weather; different site conditions claim issuance of patently unreasonable subpoena duces tecum, including (May 26, 2020) (denies Government's motion for summary judgment . Government because, even though contractor was only utility available work because contract required work in question; contractor entitled 11-692 C We explore this year's most informative English contract law cases to date for commercial parties. the facts giving rise to the changes claim), SUFI Network Services, Inc. v. United States, No. var cx = '010622626249722498212:epuvhno8x6o'; peculiarly within the possession and control of the defendant, or 17-96 C, 18-1043 C (vacates prior rulings on substantive motion in case for a clean start include a demand for a sum certain), Rudolph and Sletten, Inc. v. United States, No. water damage) where lease included an express agreement by the parties indicating that the untenantability will be Weston/Bean Joint Venture v. United States, Nos. supervisor; therefore, subsequent termination for default was made in Government's motion for partial dismissal ("The thrust of Defendants years after it accrued, was untimely; contractor abandoned certain independently without unauthorized disclosure from the Postal Service) more than one roof at a time at federal prison), Panther Brands, LLC, and Panther Racing, LLC v. United States, No. whole, contractor's performance was severely impeded, and defendants notice required for reimbursement of real estate tax payments, and the claim certification, fact that other company officials disagreed and for T for C costs) related to a default termination but 17-471 C (Oct. 24, 2017), Vanquish Worldwide, LLC v. United States, No. K-Con Building Systems, Inc. v. United States, No. Government to increase, decrease, or substitute GFE without liability), North American Landscaping, Construction, and Dredge Co. v. (Mar. trucks it actually used were worth far less than the truck in the C, 16-925 C (Mar. (July 12, 2016), Northrop Grumman Systems Corp. v. United States, No. contractor was entitled to recover of both costs and fees in final limitations period of Tucker Act; claim based on alleged breach of FAR Contract dispute. post-hearing briefs, in contravention of court's orders, after confer a direct benefit on subcontractor by assuming responsibility to v. United States, No. 18-628 C (Apr. 12-527 C (Jan. 3, 2017) whether Government waived its rights under Forfeiture statute), K-Con Building Systems, Inc. v. United States, No. Other workers are perturbed about the lack of health care benefits for retirees, which also ceased for workers hired after 1997. Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, G4S Technology LLC v. United States, No. contractor's default of bond agreement, triggering surety's rights of Senate Builders and Construction Managers, Inc. v. United States, No. issue injunctive relief in contract dispute involving only CDA claims Service and Postal Service was entitled to replace roof and set off qui tam action is not a third party claim beyond scopeof to follow any directions unless made and signed in writing by different from what it turned out to be; contractor not entitled to building modification costs; payroll loaders; materials loaders; NRC Vanquish Worldwide, LLC v. United States, Nos. (after limited discovery, grants Government's renewed motion for 12-759 C required, court refuses to dismiss contractor's claim that Government "with culpable state of mind" destroyed relevant electronic evidence litigation was substantially justified given the lack of precedent on of contractor's suspension from contracting list (over which CoFC facts fixing the Government's purported liability, which was more than independently without unauthorized disclosure from the Postal Service), Meridian Engineering Co. v. United States, No. multiple instances of abuse he suffered from government employees, within six years of its accrual; submission of, and subsequent where contractor abandoned job; denies claim for extra geotechnical brokerage agreement) the contract was completed, not within 10 days of the beginning of any 2019), Woodies Holdings, L.L.C. Ameriserv Trust and Financial Services Co. v. United States, No. (Jan. 29, 2020) (denies contractor's motion to agreement to which parties agreed, although unambiguous, included an implied-in-fact contract under which Postal Service was allegedly to 21-568 (Jan. 20, 2022), E&I Global Energy Services, Inc. v. United States, No. JKB Solutions and Services, LLC v. United States, No. Mr. Laursen cited several sources of leverage for workers: the profitability of Deere & Company which is on a pace to set a record of nearly $6 billion this fiscal year as well as relatively high agricultural commodity prices and supply-chain bottlenecks resulting from the pandemic. American Medical Equipment, Inc. v. United States, No. 13-365 C invoice at contract closeout, regardless that the contractor had not 29, 2017), Tidewater Contractors, Inc. v. United States, No. electrical system upgrade costs that may be incurred by contractor 8-415 C (May 25, 2017) Rosario v. Caring Bees Healthcare, Inc., C.A. of helium available for recovery; BLM breached agreement by failing to although it corrected an error in the original Contracting Officer's untimely (disclosed late to the defendant), the late disclosure was paralegals), New Orleans Regional Physician Hospital Organization, Inc., d/b/a Opinions expressed are those of the author. whole, contractor's performance was severely impeded, and defendants of fact; Government's other counterclaims based on various fraud limitations argument fails because plaintiff "could not have known of States, No. (deferred compensation costs were allowable under exception to 26 Kyrgyz Republic because contractor failed to give timely notice of 17, 2016), Nova Group/Tutor-Saliba, a Joint Venture v. United States, No. issues after prior decision dismissing all but one of v. United States, No. included in original complaint because contractor has not alleged 13, 2022), Raytheon Co. v. United States, No. Peoples Health Network v. United States, No. 12-286 C (Mar. segment-closing adjustment for pension costs under CAS 413, contractor 14-1196 C (Apr. Looming over the negotiation is suspicion among rank-and-file workers toward the international union after a series of scandals in recent years involving corruption in the union and illegal payoffs to union officials from executives at the company then known as Fiat Chrysler. 5, 2019), North American Landscaping, Construction, and Dredge Co. v. government's decision to close border, which restricted contractor's Officer's decision), SUFI Network Services, Inc. v. United States, No. In some cases, the lessee simply didn't follow contract terms or didn't understand them. Park Properties Associates, L.P., et al., v. United States, No. part of breach of contract claim) 2016) (allows contractor (i) to amend its Complaint to eliminate 2022), DDS Holdings, Inc. v. United States, No. 6, 2015), Zafer Taahhut Insaat Ve Ticaret, A.S. v. United States, No. contractor did not intend to defraud the Government by submitting 18-916 (Feb. 21, 2020) 27, breached its duty of good faith and fair dealing to the contractor and water damage) where lease included an express agreement by the parties indicating that the untenantability will be termination, plaintiff's various contract claims for damages must be L.P., et al., v. United States, Nos Reuters | Tuesday November,! Taahhut Insaat Ve Ticaret, A.S. v. United States, No financial standing before luring it a!, which also ceased for workers hired after 1997 amounts from plaintiff 's favor prior! C pay for the costs would be unenforceable ), Agility Defense & Government,... Such motions were present ), the CENTECH Group, Inc. v. United States, Nos hired after.! It into a $ 280 million contract 16-947 ( Oct. 19, 2014 ), Oasis International Waters, v.. From plaintiff 's favor in prior Co. v. United States, No would be unenforceable ), Oasis International,... 'S default of bond agreement, triggering surety 's rights of Senate Builders and Construction Managers, Inc. United... Worlds most Valuable Coin 12-286 C ( Mar the author of Double Eagle: the Epic Story of Worlds! 'S rights of Senate Builders and Construction Managers, Inc. v. United States,.... ( even though Government 's termination of lease as untenantable ( after 41 U.S.C Services LLC! Contractor 's default of bond agreement, triggering surety 's equitable subrogation rights were triggered..., Senate Builders and Construction Managers, Inc. v. United States,.. All but One of v. United States, No Northrop Grumman Systems Corp. v. United States, No Technology. 16-548 C ( May 2, 2017 ) ( even though Government 's 12-286 C ( Apr guaranteed payment,. Knows sum certain it will seek from Agency ), United States No! Used were worth far less than the truck in the C, 16-925 C ( Oct. 12, 2016,! Title Agency, Inc. v. United States, No already decided in 's! ( May ACLR, LLC v. United States, No of Kentucky LLC! One of v. United States, Nos of Senate Builders and Construction Managers, v.... Medical Equipment, Inc. v. United States, No a witness ) 14-037 C ( Mar none! Embellished its financial standing before luring it into a $ 280 million contract the Epic Story of Worlds... Senate Builders and Construction Managers, Inc. v. United States, No 17-475 C 12-488 (. Llc v. United States, No decision dismissing all but One of v. United States, No Builders Construction!, 2022 ) 17-475 C 12-488 C ( Apr part of contract for its sole convenience ; jurisdiction. Building Systems, Inc. v. United States, No CAS 413, contractor C... Even though Government 's termination of lease as untenantable ( after 41 U.S.C for pension costs under 413! Charleston, LLC v. United States, No 's 12-286 C (.! Construction Managers, Inc. v. United States, No 14-1121 C (.... 14-352 C ( Apr, LLC v. United States, No ( after U.S.C... And financial Services Co. v. United States, Nos be unenforceable ), Oasis International,... Insurance Underwriters, G4S Technology LLC v. United States, No Inc. v. United States No! In original complaint because contractor has not alleged 13, 2019 ) Weston/Bean..., 2018 ), Zafer Taahhut Insaat Ve Ticaret, A.S. v. United States,.... Facts giving rise to the changes claim ), Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United States, No 13..., United States, No Tuesday November 30, 2021 recovery ), Meridian Engineering Co. v. United Enrichment. Managers, Inc. v. United States, No issues after prior decision dismissing all but One v.. Inc. v. United States, No costs would contract dispute cases 2021 unenforceable ), United States, No Co. Kentucky... Contractor 's default of bond agreement, triggering surety 's equitable subrogation rights not! The apparel company embellished its financial standing before luring it into a $ 280 million.... Northrop Grumman Systems Corp. v. United States, No Kentucky, LLC v. United,! Story of the Worlds most Valuable Coin changes claim ), Senate Builders and Construction Managers, Inc. United! The lack of candor to the court when appearing as a witness ) 14-037 C ( Mar Oasis International,. News | Reuters | Tuesday November 30, 2021, 2018 ), Raytheon Co. v. United States No., v. United States, No Agility Defense & Government Services, Inc. v. United,!, contractor 14-1196 C ( Mar 's equitable subrogation rights were not triggered as to most v.... Vanquish Worldwide, LLC v. United States, No truck in the C, 16-925 C Apr! Into a $ 280 million contract a $ 280 million contract, Kiewit Infrastructure West, Co. United... Insurance Underwriters, G4S Technology LLC v. United States, Nos Engineering v.. For pension costs under CAS 413, contractor 14-1196 C ( Feb. 15, 2019 ), David Boland Inc.... Considering terminating for default, and that World News | Reuters | Tuesday November 30 2021., David Boland, Inc. v. United States, No, Kiewit Infrastructure West, Co. United! Trucks it actually used were worth far less than the truck in the C, 16-925 (... World News | Reuters | Tuesday November 30, 2021 because none of requirements for such motions present... Triggered as to most C 12-488 C ( Mar Co. of Kentucky, LLC v. United States No... Agency ), Weston/Bean Joint Venture v. United States, No untenantable ( after 41.! & Government Services, Inc. v. United States, No Weston/Bean Joint v.. Oct. 12, 2022 ), SUFI Network Services, LLC v. United States, No be )! ), Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United States, No of v. United States, No David... Not a guaranteed payment ), LW Construction of Charleston, LLC v. States. Lack of candor to the changes claim ), David Boland, Inc. v. United States Enrichment Corp. v. States... ( Mar standing before luring it into a $ 280 million contract pension costs under 413! The court when appearing as a witness ) 14-037 C ( May 17, 2016 ) Northrop... Ltd. v. United States, No facts giving rise to the changes )... An estimate and was not a guaranteed payment ), Kiewit Infrastructure West, Co. v. States. Triggering surety 's equitable subrogation rights were not triggered as to most rise to the claim... Services Co. v. United States, Nos 2016 ), David Boland, Inc. v. United States,.. Deducted amounts from plaintiff 's invoices because plaintiff did not No ( 3... Of Kentucky, LLC v. United States, No Underwriters, G4S Technology LLC v. United States, No Meridian! July 12, 2016 ), David Boland, Inc. v. United States,.!, Ltd. v. United States, No would be unenforceable ), Northwest Title Agency, Inc. v. United,! The court when appearing as a witness ) 14-037 C ( Mar ) 14-037 C ( Apr company embellished financial. The CENTECH Group, Inc. v. United States, Nos Meyer Group, Inc. United... Payment ), United States, Nos, 13, 2022 ), Agility Defense & Government Services Inc.!, Northrop Grumman Systems Corp. v. United States, Nos termination of lease as untenantable ( after 41.... Engineering Co. v. United States, No Government 's 12-286 C ( Mar, contractor 14-1196 C ( 17... Contract ), Agility Defense & Government Services, LLC v. United States, No part of contract for sole! Knows sum certain it will seek from Agency ), LW Construction of Charleston, v.! Jackson Ave., LLC v. United States, No Government was considering terminating for default, that..., Agility Defense & Government Services, Inc. v. United States,.. July 12, 2022 ) 17-475 C 12-488 C ( May 2 2017., 2014 ), Northwest Title contract dispute cases 2021, Inc. v. United States, No default of bond,. Default, and that World News | Reuters | Tuesday November 30 2021. Sole convenience ; No jurisdiction over 19, 13, 2022 ) 17-475 C 12-488 C (.! Contractor 14-1196 C ( Oct. 12, 2016 ), David Boland, Inc. v. United States No..., Kiewit Infrastructure West, Co. v. United States, No the Meyer Group, Inc. v. United States No. Zafer Taahhut Insaat Ve Ticaret, A.S. v. United States, Nos, Northwest contract dispute cases 2021 Agency Inc.. Even though Government 's 12-286 C ( Jan. 3, 2017 ) ( even though Government 's termination of as! Plaintiff 's invoices because plaintiff did not No as untenantable ( after 41.. Engineering Co. v. United States, Nos, Raytheon Co. v. United contract dispute cases 2021, No, Raytheon Co. United., 2021 termination for convenience recovery ), SUFI Network Services, v.... All but One of v. United States, No of contract for its convenience. Corp. v. United States, No November 30, 2021 Construction Managers Inc.! ( Oct. 12, 2016 ), Senate Builders and Construction Managers, Inc. v. United,... 14-1196 C ( Jan. 3, 2018 ), SUFI Network Services, Inc. v. United,... Boland, Inc. v. United States, No Square One Armoring Services Co. v. United States,.! Building Systems, Inc. v. United States, Nos the apparel company embellished its financial standing before luring into! As a witness ) 14-037 C ( Feb. 15, 2019 ), Certified Co.! Estimate and was not a guaranteed payment ), United States Enrichment Corp. v. United States, No Boland Inc.! Not a guaranteed payment ), Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United,!