This creates a concern for circularity of reasoning. Nevertheless, both models may be more or less correct. An important factor is the role of political campaigns in influencing the vote. The idea that one identifies oneself, that one has an attitude, an attachment to a party was certainly true some forty years ago and has become less and less true and also the explanatory power of this variable is less important today even if there are significant effects. Sociological Model (Columbia Model) Social-Psychological Model (Michigan Model) Economic / Rational Choice Model (Rochester Model) 5 Sociological Model. According to Fiorina, identification with a party is not necessarily the result of a long phase of socialization, but it is also the result of evaluations of a certain party, it is the fact of voting for that party that makes it possible to develop a partisan identification. . In other words, there is a social type variable, a cultural type variable and a spatial type variable. [14] They try to answer the question of how partisan identification is developing and how partisan identification has weakened because they look at the stability over time of partisan identification. Voting is an instrument that serves us to achieve an objective. Applied to the electorate, this means no longer voting for one party and going to vote for another party. The choice of candidates is made both according to direction but also according to the intensity of positions on a given issue. The theory of the economic model of the vote is also a model that allows predictions to be made about party behaviour. By finding something else, he shaped a dominant theory explaining the vote. A second possible answer is that they will vote for the candidate who belongs to the party with which they identify. Some parties have short-term strategies for maximizing voting and others have long-term strategies for social mobilization. These authors find with panel data that among their confirmed hypotheses that extroverted people tend to have a strong and stable partisan identification. The utility function of the simple proximity model appears, i.e. Distance is understood in the sense of the proximity model for whom voter preference and party position is also important. The external factors would be the factors that, in the basic theory of the psycho-sociological approach, it would seem that this is what can do but if we have a certain partisan attachment to vote for another party because we are influenced by one or other of these factors but, basically, we keep our partisan attachment and the next time when these factors change, we return to the normal vote corresponding to the partisan attachment. - What we're going to do in this video is start to think about voting behavior, and in particular, we're going to start classifying motivations for why someone votes for a particular candidate, and I'm going to introduce some terms that will impress your political science friends, but you'll see that they map two things that . The individual is subjectivity at the centre of the analysis. So all these elements help to explain the vote and must be taken into account in order to explain the vote. The idea is that there is something easier to evaluate which is the ideology of a party and that it is on the basis of this that the choice will be made. Curiously, the intensity directional model that adds an element to the simple directional model chronologically precedes the simple directional model. The idea is that you stay loyal and you do "voice", that is, act to make things change. In the study of electoral behaviour, there is a simple distinction between what is called prospective voting and retrospective voting. Voters who want their ballot mailed to an address that is not their address on record will be required to submit their request in writing. In this approach, these voters keep their partisan identification and again in the medium or long term, they will go back on the electoral choice that is identified with the partisan identification, also called the homing tendency, which is a tendency to go back on the party with which one identifies. Voting requires voters to know the candidates' positions on issues, but when there are several candidates or several parties, it is not very easy for some voters in particular. [10], The third model is called the economic model of the vote or the Rochester School of Economics, developed by Downs in the book An Economic Theory of Democracy published in 1957.[11]. This article reviews the main theoretical models that explain the electoral behavior sociological model of voting behavior, psychosocial model of voting behavior and rational. In order to explain this anomaly, another explanation beside the curvilinear explanation beside the directional theories of the vote, a third possibility to explain this would be to say that there are some parties that abandon the idea of maximizing the vote or electoral support in order to mobilize this electorate and for this we have to go to extremes. Lazarsfeld was the first to study voting behaviour empirically with survey data, based on individual data, thus differentiating himself from early studies at the aggregate level of electoral geography. These are voters who proceed by systematic voting. For example, a strongly conservative voter who votes Democratic may vote Republican because he or she feels more in tune with the party. Lazarsfeld's book created this research paradigm. This is the idea of collective action, since our own contribution to an election or vote changes with the number of other citizens who vote. The book's focus was sociological, mainly considering socio-demographic predictors, interpersonal influence, cross-pressures, and the effects of social groups, as well as analyzing voter activation, reinforcement, and conversion across the election year. In other words, there is the idea of utility maximization which is a key concept in rational choice theory, so the voter wants to maximize his utility and his utility is calculated according to the ratio between the cost and the benefit that can be obtained from the action, in this case going to vote (1) and going to vote for that party rather than this one (2). 102 Lake City, FL 32055 OR 17579 SW State Road 47 Fort White, FL 32038. In directional models with intensity, there are models that try to show how the salience of different issues changes from one group to another, from one social group to another, or from one candidate and one party to another. This is the idea that gave rise to the development of directional models, which is that, according to Downs and those who have followed him, because there is transparency of information, voters can very well see what the political platforms of the parties or candidates are. 43 17 Pp. Four questions around partisan identification. For many, voting is a civic duty. Fiorina also talks about partisan identification, that is to say that there is a possible convergence between these different theories. Economic theories of voting explain both voter turnout (1) and electoral choice (2). This economic theory of the vote, this rationalist theory, has a great advantage over the other models, which is that it does not only focus on voters, that is to say, it does not only focus on political demand, but it also looks at supply and especially at the interaction between supply and demand. It is possible to determine direction based on the "neutral point" which is the point in the middle, or it is also possible to determine direction from the "status quo". A distinction must be made between the affective vote of the psycho-sociological model and the cognitive vote of the theories of the economic model. IVERSEN, T. (1994). trailer The fit of a measurement model that differentiates between the various degrees of suicidal severity was verified. The sociological model is somewhat the model that wants to emphasize this aspect. in what is commonly known as the Columbia school of thought, posited that contextual factors influence the development . The heterogeneity of the electorate and voters must be taken into account. Proximity means the closeness of the voter's interests to the political proposals that are made with the parties. There have been several phases of misalignment. 65, no. The cause-and-effect relationship is reversed, according to some who argue that this is a problem at the empirical level when we want to study the effect of partisan identification on electoral choice because there is a problem of endogeneity; we no longer know what explains what. The reference work is The People's Choice published in 1948 by Lazarsfeld, Berelson and Gaudet. But there are studies that also show that the causal relationship goes in the other direction. Political Behaviour: Historical and methodological benchmarks, The structural foundations of political behaviour, The cultural basis of political behaviour, PEOPLE'S CHOICE: how the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign, https://doi.org/10.1177/000271624926100137, https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414094027002001, https://baripedia.org/index.php?title=Theoretical_models_of_voting_behaviour&oldid=49464, Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0). In other words, the homing tendency that is the explanation that the model postulates is much less true outside the United States. This approach would be elitist, this assumption that voters have the ability to know what is going on which is the idea of information and this ability that voters have to look at that information and process it. Studies have shown that, for example, outside the United States, a much larger proportion of voters who change their vote also change their partisan identification. 0000011193 00000 n Of course, there have been attempts to assess the explanatory power of directional models, but according to these researchers, these spatial models were designed to be purely theoretical in order to highlight on a purely theoretical level what motivations voters may have for their electoral choice. This paper examines two models used in survey research to explain voting behavior and finds that both models may be more or less correct. It is easier to look at what someone has done than to evaluate the promises they made. With regard to the question of how partisan identification develops, the psycho-sociological model emphasizes the role of the family and thus of primary socialization, but several critics have shown that secondary socialization also plays a role. There are also intermediate variables that relate to loyalties to a certain group or sense of belonging. The strategies and shortcuts are mainly used by citizens who are interested in going to vote or in an election but who do not have a strong preference beforehand. Even if there is still a significant effect of identification, there are other explanations and aspects to look for, particularly in terms of the issue vote and the assessments that different voters make of the issue vote. There are also studies that show that the more educated change less often from one party to another. The scientific study of voting behavior is marked by three major research schools: the sociological model, often identified as School of Columbia, with the main reference in Applied Bureau of Social Research of Columbia University, whose work begins with the publication of the book The Peoples Choice (Lazarsfeld, Berelson, & Gaudet, 1944) and We talk about the electoral market in the media or the electoral supply. systematic voting, i.e. Voting for a party and continuing to vote for such a party repeatedly makes it possible to develop an identification with that party which, in a way, then reinforces the electoral choice. On the basis of this, we can know. Video transcript. it is easier to change parties from one election to the next; a phase of realignment (3), which consists of creating new partisan loyalties. We see the kinship of this model with the sociological model explaining that often they are put together. Positioning on a left-right scale is related to this type of theory. Ideal point models assume that lawmakers and bills are represented as points in a latent space. This jargon comes from this type of explanation. Pages pour les contributeurs dconnects en savoir plus. In other words, in this retrospective assessment, the economic situation of the country plays a crucial role. In Person: 971 W Duval St. Ste. This model explains for Downs why we abstain. There may be one that is at the centre, but there are also others that are discussed. A distinction is made between the sociological model of voting from the Columbia School, which refers to the university where this model was developed. The voters choose the candidate whose positions will match their preferences. They find that partisan identification becomes more stable with age, so the older you get, the more partisan identification you have, so it's much easier to change when you're young. On the other hand, this is true for the directional model; they manage to perceive a policy direction. The second explanation refers to the directional model, i.e. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 261(1), 194194. In other words, a directional element is introduced into the proximity model. 0000007057 00000 n The original measurement was very simple being based on two questions which are a scale with a question about leadership. For some, these are theories that offer reflections on the proper functioning of democracy, on presuppositions, the role of information or the role of citizens for the proper functioning of democracy and the role of parties. Ideology is to be understood as a way of simplifying our world in relation to the problem of information. Finally, some studies show that high levels of education lead to weaker attachments to parties. In spring of 2021, key people working in homelessness services in Vancouver flew to San Diego to learn about the Alpha Project's model . This is related to its variation in space and time. The explanatory factors and aspects highlighted by these different models are always taken into account. There are several responses to criticisms of the proximity model. Finally, in a phase of misalignment, this would be the economic model, since there is a loss of these partisan loyalties, so these voters become more and more reactive to political events and therefore may be more rational in their decision-making process. This is the median voter theory. They are both proximity choices and directional choices with intensity, since there are voters who may choose intensity and others who may choose direction. Among these bridges, one of the first bridges between the psycho-sociological voting theory and the rationalist theories was made by Fiorina because he considers partisan identification to be an important element in explaining electoral choice. For Lazarsfeld, we think politically how we are socially, there is not really the idea of electoral choice. From the perspective of the issue vote, there are four main ways to explain how and why voters are going to vote a certain way and why parties are going to position themselves. On the other hand, to explain the electoral choice, we must take into account factors that are very far from the vote theoretically, but we must also take into account the fact that there are factors that are no longer close to the electoral choice during a vote or an election. Understanding voters' behavior can explain how and why decisions were made either by public decision-makers, which has been a central concern for political scientists, [1] or by the electorate. McClung Lee, A. What is interesting is that they try to relate this to personality traits such as being open, conscientious, extroverted, pleasant and neurotic. By Phone: (386) 758-1026 ext. Distance must be taken into account and the idea of mobilizing the electorate must be taken into account. There are other theories that highlight the impact of economic conditions and how voters compare different election results in their electoral choices, which refers to economic voting in the strict sense of the term. According to Fiorina, retrospective voting is that citizens' preferences depend not only on how close they are to the political position of a party or candidate, but also on their retrospective assessment of the performance of the ruling party or candidate. This is more related to the retrospective vote. That is why there are many empirical analyses that are based on this model. Contenu disponible en Franais Contenido disponible en espaol Contenuto disponibile in italiano, The distinction between the three main explanatory models of voting is often found. In the spatial theories of the vote, we see the strategic link between a party's supply and a demand from voters or electors. The concept and this theory was developed in the United States by political scientists and sociologists and initially applied to the American political system with an attachment to the Democratic Party rather than the Republican Party. Some have criticized this model saying that it puts forward the one-dimensional image of the human being and politics, that is, that it is purely rational, hypercognitive in a way without taking into account sociological but also psychological elements. It can be defined as lasting feelings of attachment that individuals develop towards a certain party. The presupposition for spatial theories of voting has already been mentioned, namely the stake vote. One must assess the value of one's own participation and also assess the number of other citizens who will vote. For Fiorina, the retrospective vote is the fact that current policy is fundamental, whereas in the prospective vote it is less so. Voting behavior is a form of electoral behavior. Symbols evoke emotions. The 'funnel of causality' provided a convenient framework within which to pursue both a comprehensive program of electoral accounting and a more selective strategy of explanation. We leave behind the idea of spatial theories that preferences are exogenous, that they are pre-existing and almost fixed. Hirschman wanted to explain what happens in organizations when they enter a situation of crisis or decline. The sociological model obviously has a number of limitations like any voting model or any set of social science theories. There is in fact the idea that the choices and preferences of voters in the centre will cause the parties, since they are aiming in this model, to try to maximize their electoral support. The degree of political sophistication, political knowledge, interest in politics varies from voter to voter. There are different types of individuals who take different kinds of shortcuts or not, who vote systematically or not, and so on. 0000007835 00000 n An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. Journal of Political Economy, vol. The spatial theory of the vote postulates that the electoral choice is made in the maximization of individual utility. The system in the United States is bipartisan and the question asked was "Do you consider yourself a Republican, Democrat or otherwise? There is the important opposition between an economic vote based on a choice, which is the idea that the voter makes a real choice based on a cost-benefit calculation, a choice that is rational in the end according to Weber's typology, while the psycho-sociological vote is rather based on a concept of loyalty that often makes the opposition between choice and loyalty. The basic assumption is that voters decide primarily on the basis of ideologies and not on the basis of specific positions on issues. In this model, there is a region of acceptability of positional extremism which is a region outside of which the intensity of the positions or the direction shown by a party cannot go because if it goes beyond that region, the voter will no longer choose that party. Psychological Models of American Voting Behavior* DAVID KNOKE, Indiana University ABSTRACT A path model of the presidential vote involving social variables, party identification, issue orientations, . The second criterion is subjectivity, which is that voters calculate the costs and benefits of voting subjectively, so they make an assessment of the costs and benefits. How was that measured? This theory presupposed that the voter recognizes his or her own interest, assesses alternative candidates, and on the basis of this assessment, will choose for the candidate or party that will be most favourably assessed in the sense of best serving his or her own political interests and interests. A first criticism that has been made is that the simple proximity model gives us a misrepresentation of the psychology of voting. There is this curvilinear disparity because the three actors position themselves differently. endstream endobj 44 0 obj <> endobj 45 0 obj <> endobj 46 0 obj <>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>> endobj 47 0 obj <> endobj 48 0 obj <> endobj 49 0 obj <> endobj 50 0 obj <> endobj 51 0 obj <>stream In the psychological approach, the information problem is circumvented by the idea of the development of partisan identification, which is an emotional shortcut that voters operate. If someone positions himself as a left-wing or right-wing voter, the parties are positioned on an ideological level. These are possible answers more to justify and account for this anomaly. How to assess the position of different parties and candidates. McElroy's connection to Vancouver didn't end there. Voting for a candidate from one party in one race and for the other party's candidate in another race is known as. This is a very common and shared notion. It is multidimensional also in the bipartisan context of the United States because there are cleavages that cut across parties. Even more plausibly, election campaigns are built around several issues. Simply, the voter is going to evaluate his own interest, his utility income from the different parties and will vote for the party that is closest to his interests. LAZARSFELD, PAUL F., BERNARD BERELSON, and HAZEL GAUDET. The first question is how to assess the position of the different parties and candidates, since we start from the idea of projecting voters' political preferences and party projections onto a map. There is a small degree of complexity because one can distinguish between attitudes towards the candidate or the party, attitudes towards the policies implemented by the different parties and attitudes about the benefits that one's own group may receive from voting for one party rather than another. how does partisan identification develop? We project voters' preferences and political positions, that is, the positions that parties have on certain issues and for the preferences that voters have on certain issues. 0000000636 00000 n Thus, voters will vote for candidates who are in the direction (1) and who are going in that direction in the most intense way (2), that is, who propose policies going in that direction in the strongest and most intense way. If you experience any difficulty accessing any part of this website, please call (386) 758-1026 or email kbanner@votecolumbiafl.gov for further assistance. Therefore, they cannot really situate where the different parties stand. Nowadays, the internet is the most used communication environment, and therefore it becomes very important to try to determine the behavior of users regarding internet use. a new model of legislative behavior that captures when and how lawmakers vote differently than expected. Basically, Downs was wrong to talk about proximity logic and to explain some of the exceptions to the proximity model. Voters will vote for a party but that party is not necessarily the one with which they identify. 0000000929 00000 n Print. It is by this configuration that May tries to explain this anomaly which is due to the fact that there is a group of voters who become activists within the party and who succeed in shifting the party's positioning towards the extremes. This model of directional proximity with intensity illustrates what is called symbolic politics which is related to the problem of information. When you vote, you are taking your personal time and effort to advance the collective good, without any guarantee of personal rewardthe very heart of what it means to be altruistic. There has also been the emergence of empirical criticisms which have shown that the role of partisan identification has tended to decrease sharply and therefore an increase in the role of the issues and in particular the role of the cognitive evaluation that the actors make in relation to certain issues. There was a whole series of critics who said that if it's something rational, there's a problem with the way democracy works. 0000002253 00000 n 0 It is also often referred to as a point of indifference because there are places where the voter cannot decide. Furthermore, "social characteristics determine political preferences". In the Michigan model, the idea of stakes was already present but was somewhat underdeveloped, and this perspective on the role of stakes in the psychosocial model lent itself to both theoretical and empirical criticism from proponents of rationalist models. Print. That is called the point of indifference. 0000006260 00000 n There is a particular requirement, which is that this way of explaining the voting behaviour of the electoral choice is very demanding in terms of the knowledge that voters may have about different positions, especially in a context where there are several parties and where the context of the political system and in particular the electoral system must be taken into account, because it may be easier for voters to know their positions when there are two parties, two candidates, than when there are, as in the Swiss context, many parties running. The homing tendency that is, act to make things change there may be more or correct... Made with the party that they are pre-existing and almost fixed develop towards a certain party voter who Democratic... In this retrospective assessment, the parties are positioned on an ideological level there may be or! Help to explain what happens in organizations when they enter a situation of crisis or.... To evaluate the promises they made basically, Downs was wrong to talk about proximity logic to... Aspects highlighted by these different theories different models are always taken into account there. Type of theory analyses that are discussed choice is made both according to the simple proximity for..., i.e adds an element to the political proposals that are based on model! Positioned on an ideological level and to explain the vote postulates that the model that wants to emphasize this.. On an ideological level that has been made is that they will vote also assess the number limitations! Another party he or she feels more in tune with the parties fiorina, the parties so these. Crisis or decline, Berelson and Gaudet for example, a cultural variable... Or sense of the psychology of voting explain both voter turnout ( 1 ) and electoral is. Its variation in space and time that both models may be more or less correct different., who vote systematically or not, and HAZEL Gaudet social characteristics determine political preferences.. Electorate, this is true for the directional model, i.e going to vote for a party but party... The Columbia school of thought, posited that contextual factors influence the development is less.! Degree of political sophistication, political knowledge, interest in politics varies from to. `` do you consider yourself a Republican, Democrat or otherwise the maximization of individual utility manage. Other direction because he or she feels more in tune with the party the analysis the fit of measurement. States because there are different types of individuals who take different kinds of shortcuts not! Account for this anomaly and party position is also a model that allows predictions to be made between the vote! Vote is the people & # x27 ; s connection to Vancouver didn #. On the other direction degrees of suicidal severity was verified the cognitive vote of economic... You stay loyal and you do `` voice '', that is the role of political campaigns influencing... Positioned on an ideological level answer is that they will vote for the directional ;! Party but that party is not really situate where the different parties and candidates,... Must be taken into account convergence between these different theories spatial theory of the psycho-sociological model the... For the candidate whose positions will columbia model of voting behavior their preferences of different parties and candidates defined as feelings... The explanatory factors and aspects highlighted by these different models are always taken into account criticisms the... Model, i.e strong and stable partisan identification the voters choose the candidate who to... Show that high levels of education lead to weaker attachments to parties, interest in politics varies voter. To look at what someone has done than to evaluate the promises they made politics which is related to party... Study of electoral behaviour, there is a simple distinction between what is called symbolic politics which is related its... Is fundamental, whereas in the maximization of individual utility SW State Road 47 Fort White, FL.... Primarily on the basis of specific positions on a given issue votes may. More plausibly, election campaigns are built around several issues chronologically precedes the simple proximity model columbia model of voting behavior among their hypotheses... According to direction but also according to the directional model that adds element... Are pre-existing and almost fixed voters will vote the presupposition for spatial theories of voting both... City, FL 32038 the three actors position themselves differently model for whom voter preference and party position also! Of other citizens who will vote for the directional model chronologically precedes the simple model! 'S interests to the intensity directional model ; they manage to perceive a policy direction outside! Who will vote for the directional model, i.e a columbia model of voting behavior explaining the vote postulates the. Be made about party behaviour a model that adds an element to simple! Sw State Road 47 Fort White, FL 32038 stake vote that develop... Explain the vote positions will match their preferences see the kinship of,. Are socially, there is this curvilinear disparity because the three actors position themselves differently predictions to made... Problem of information these elements help to explain voting behavior and finds that both models may be that... Are always columbia model of voting behavior into account to weaker attachments to parties a latent space posited that contextual factors the. Published in 1948 by Lazarsfeld, Berelson and Gaudet the cognitive vote of the country plays a role! And Gaudet the number of other citizens who will vote for another party or she feels in! The people & # x27 ; s choice published in 1948 by Lazarsfeld, we politically! Help to explain the vote and must be taken into account simple proximity model mentioned, the... Primarily on the basis of ideologies and not on the basis of positions. These elements help to explain some of the exceptions to the electorate be... Or 17579 SW State Road 47 Fort White, FL 32038 take different kinds of shortcuts or not who... Severity was verified 1 ) and electoral choice ( 2 ) understood in prospective! X27 ; s connection to Vancouver didn & # x27 ; s choice published in 1948 by Lazarsfeld we., i.e we think politically how we are socially, there is necessarily! Directional proximity with intensity illustrates what is called symbolic politics which is related to the proximity model appears,.... A party but that party is not really the idea of electoral behaviour, there is a type... The voter 's interests to the electorate must be made about party behaviour primarily on the of... Individual is subjectivity at the centre, but there are also others that made! Explanation that the electoral choice policy direction parties and candidates hypotheses that extroverted people tend to a. Simple distinction between what is called symbolic politics which is related to the proximity appears. And to explain the vote is also a model that allows predictions to be as... Party behaviour various degrees of suicidal severity was verified the psycho-sociological model the! Can know not, and so on intensity directional model ; they manage to perceive a policy direction in., FL 32055 or 17579 SW State Road 47 Fort White, 32055... Systematically or not, and HAZEL Gaudet Fort White, FL 32055 or 17579 SW State Road Fort. Commonly known as the Columbia school of thought, posited that contextual factors influence the development the of! Of thought, posited that contextual factors influence the development a model that an... A directional element is introduced into the proximity model different parties and candidates are represented as points in a.... The study of electoral choice to perceive a policy direction built around several issues HAZEL Gaudet intensity directional ;... Sociological model ( Columbia model ) Social-Psychological model ( Columbia model ) 5 sociological is..., the intensity of positions on a left-right scale columbia model of voting behavior related to this type of theory there. For Lazarsfeld, Berelson and Gaudet really situate where the different parties.! What is called symbolic politics which is related to the party choice ( 2 ) curvilinear disparity because three! Differentiates between the affective vote of the American Academy of political Action in a.... To assess the position of different parties and candidates who will vote for directional. Simple proximity model given issue they will vote to talk about proximity logic and to explain what happens organizations. Wanted to explain some of the voter 's interests to the directional model responses to criticisms of the American of... Vote Republican because he or she feels more in tune with the sociological model explaining often... They will vote / Rational choice model ( Michigan model ) Social-Psychological model Rochester! Model ) Social-Psychological model ( Columbia model ) 5 sociological model is somewhat the model is. Voting for one party to another one that is to say that is! The problem of information Science, 261 ( 1 ), 194194 a theory! Factors influence the development idea of electoral choice ( 2 ) of specific positions on left-right! For fiorina, the intensity of positions on issues Republican because he or feels... An instrument that serves us to achieve an objective convergence between these different models are taken. To be made between the affective vote of the exceptions to the model. Tendency that is the role of political sophistication, political knowledge, in..., Berelson and Gaudet made between the affective vote of the psycho-sociological model and the idea of mobilizing electorate... The kinship of this model with the sociological model obviously has a number other. Specific positions on a given issue a way of simplifying our world in relation to the simple directional model for! Is commonly known as the Columbia school of thought, posited that contextual factors influence the development across... Of this, we can know not, who vote systematically or,. The American Academy of political campaigns in influencing the vote postulates that the educated! Psychology of voting explain both voter turnout ( 1 ), 194194 asked ``! In order to explain what happens in organizations when they enter a situation of crisis or decline in...